跳至主要內容
MY JAPAN LIST

先收著,下次就找得到。

這個瀏覽器裡的收藏。換裝置前,記得把連結帶走。

去安排旅程 →

CHEAPUNO guide

Why does AI code keep failing the same tests repeatedly?

Learn how to stop AI coding errors by adding deterministic verification layers like linters and unit tests to your workflow.

What you are probably seeing

You notice the same bug appearing in your codebase after you tell the AI to fix it. The error rate stays high because the AI does not remember past failures and regenerates the flawed logic each time.

Your deployment pipeline stays blocked. Manual review takes longer because you must re-verify code that should have already passed basic structural checks. The lack of automated guards makes every commit a risk.

Why it happens

Language models generate code probabilistically rather than deterministically. They predict the next likely token based on patterns, which means they can produce plausible-looking code that lacks consistent internal logic or type safety.

Most developer workflows rely on vague prompts and human review. Without strict linting rules or unit tests to reject bad code instantly, the AI has no feedback loop to learn from its mistakes during the generation process.

What changed recently

2026-10-07 · best ai for code verification
Developers are tightening linting rules to constrain AI output:
• Write the full dev plan in a Markdown file before coding
• Enforce tight linter and type rules to constrain generation
• Avoid one-shot non-trivial pushes to master
Source: autocomplete

Step by step

1. Document your full development plan in a Markdown file before starting any coding session to give the AI a stable context boundary.

2. Configure your linter and type checker to treat warnings as errors so that generated code fails fast on style and structural issues.

3. Write unit tests for critical functions first and instruct the AI to make those tests pass without modifying the test logic itself.

4. Disable one-shot pushes to your main branch and require all AI-generated code to pass a local verification script before merging.

5. Review the diff output of your linter after each AI generation to identify specific constraints the model ignored and update your prompt accordingly.

Ways to go further

Affiliate links: CHEAPUNO may earn a commission if you buy through them, at no extra cost to you.

Other problems readers raise

How to find remote jobs without visa requirements?

Why does my resume disappear into the ATS void?

Do you need structured prompts or simple queries for LLMs?

How to break complex LLM coding projects into subcomponents?

Does AI quality hide skill gaps in revisions?

Sources

Follow the evidence.